Talk:V&A Dundee
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:07, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
Removal of content on the Reception section
editHi,
I don't understand why the Huntz got rid of the positive receptions I added on the Reception heading.
There is positive receptions of the museum which I don't understand was removed:
Due to the V&A Dundee's presence in being Scotland's first design museum and being, the museum has received accolades from media outlets such as The Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg, Lonely Planet, CNN Travel, Conde Nast Traveller, the Times and PBS. In 2019, the V&A Dundee was nominated and later a finalist in the Art Fund Museum of the Year and was featured as one of the best places to visit in the world by TIMETIME. KeyKing666 (talk) 09:12, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
- The Hushz KeyKing666 (talk) 09:13, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
Inadvertent removal of content
editThis edit removes content that was apparently copyrighted.
The intermediate edits by 94.174.69.114 have been struck out (as even archived copies are copyvios). It's assumed that it's those struck-out edits are the ones that had to be removed.
However, this isn't a straight reversion to the immediately-preceding version; other content has also been removed. Am I correct in assuming that this was an oversight on the part of @Diannaa: and that it was okay to restore the content from the older (non-struck-out/hidden) revisions?
Laerol (talk) 13:07, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- The image and the missing paragraph were removed by the IP, not by me. They both look okay to restore. — Diannaa (talk) 13:50, 20 June 2022 (UTC)