This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
"Subordinate to the JAG of the Navy" may not be the best way to put it, but there has to be something in this article about the relationship between Navy and Marine Corps legal. Navy TJAG has Article 6 inspection authority and Article 69 post-trial review authority over the Marine Corps. PubliusFL 18:46, 6 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
No - that was very useful. As a Brit, just fresh from watching 'A Few Good Men', but aware of the legendary inter-service rivalries among the US Armed Forces, I was wondering why the USMC was allowing its officers to be interrogated by USN officers. Also, I now understand what 'Division' means in the context of that movie! And why the Marine Corps officers were so extra-disdainful of the Navy lawyers!
