The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was Not merged. Per quasi-unanimous opposition. Pilaz (talk) 02:52, 8 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

The resolution was not adopted as one of the permanent members used its veto. Sakiv (talk) 16:45, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

The veto can't be used under this circumstance. —— Eric LiuTalk 18:15, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Well, we did not know that the resolution is "procedural" and not like previous resolutions that fail when the veto is used. The one who created the article should have paid attention to this point and added it to the content.--Sakiv (talk) 19:03, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
If this is to be merged, it should be merged into the Eleventh emergency special session of the United Nations General Assembly Painting17 (talk) 19:24, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Agreed, we already have articles about most of the emergency special sessions in UN history. It would make sense to keep that article but not this separate one about the resolution that authorized it. Minh Nguyễn 💬 20:48, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply