Talk:United Federation of Teachers

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Vinithehat in topic Fight Against School Co-location Inequities

References? edit

This article badly needs references to support notability - I can't believe it has been around so long without this issue being raised. – ukexpat (talk) 18:18, 11 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Copy / Paste edit

many of the sections in this article are lame cop/paste jobs form the press releases from the UFT website. there's too many for me to start going into right now, but this whole article is a piece of UFT authored crap. ViniTheHat (talk) 18:53, 22 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problem removed edit

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:31, 1 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Fight Against School Co-location Inequities edit

Perhaps the heading of this section should be a reference to the court case, the title of the suit? Also, perhaps for sake of balance, I am sure the city's people had a statement issued on the topic. This should likely be included. This is the UFT article for sure, but this isn't the UFT's epic. Any situation the UFT was involved in - especially a court case - should be presented bilaterally. (but much improved, thanks!) ViniTheHat (talk) 13:00, 28 June 2011 (UTC)Reply