Talk:U.S. Route 59 in Oklahoma

U.S. Route 59 in Oklahoma has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 14, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed

U.S. Roads: U.S. Highways / Oklahoma Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics

U.S. Highways

Locations

Oklahoma

This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.

This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Article recognition:

	This article was the selected article of the U.S. Roads Portal in December 2018.

Oklahoma Low‑importance

	Oklahoma portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reassessment

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

History is a bit vague and sketchy. The third-level header also implies that part of the history is missing. – T M F 03:22, 9 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

This article is full of factual errors and is poorly written. It needs to be completely rewritten from scratch. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bugo (talk • contribs) 05:56, 26 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Done —Scott5114 ↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 08:37, 24 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic