Talk:U.S. Route 1 Business (Trenton, New Jersey)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleU.S. Route 1 Business (Trenton, New Jersey) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 21, 2012Good article nomineeListed


Straight from the horse's mouth (an email from NJDOT):

The section south of the Brunswick Circle, known as Brunswick Circle Extension-Princeton Avenue-Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard, to the vicinity of Calhoun Street in the Townships of Lawrence and Ewing, and the City of Trenton is under Mercer County jurisdiction. Hence the section to the south within Trenton known as Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard is under municipal jurisdiction. As a service to the public, the Department of Transportation has provided signing as depicted in the photo you provided.

--SPUI (talk) 22:17, 8 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:U.S. Route 1 Business (Trenton, New Jersey)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 15:28, 21 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    Quality of the article is good.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
    Article complies with MoS.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    Good.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    See comment section. Issue fixed.
    C. No original research:  
    No original research found.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    Article covers all major aspects about the topic.
    B. Focused:  
    Article remains focused throughout.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
    No bias found.
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
    Article is stable.
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    Images are tagged correctly.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
    Images are included, appropriate, and have suitable captions.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    See comment section. Pass!--Dom497 (talk) 17:57, 21 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Comments edit

  • Reference number 4 doesn't seem to be working. This needs to be fixed before I can pass the article.

Everything else is good but the article will be on hold for 7 days in order to fix reference number 4.--Dom497 (talk) 15:38, 21 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Since Dough is on vacation, I revived the link through http://www.archive.org/ on his behalf. Imzadi 1979  15:51, 21 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
I have passed the article.--Dom497 (talk) 17:57, 21 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on U.S. Route 1 Business (Trenton, New Jersey). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:10, 16 January 2018 (UTC)Reply