Talk:Typhoon Halong (2002)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleTyphoon Halong (2002) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starTyphoon Halong (2002) is part of the 2002 Pacific typhoon season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 8, 2012Good article nomineeListed
January 4, 2013Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Typhoon Halong (2002)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Yellow Evan (talk · contribs) 00:52, 8 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

  • "Typhoon Halong (international designation: 0207,[1] JTWC designation: 10W[2], PAGASA local name: Inday) in 2002 passed just south of Guam only one week after Typhoon Chataan struck the island and left heavy damage." I suggest removing "only" as IMO it adds no value to the sentence. 00:52, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
  • " The seventh named storm of the season, Halong developed near the same location as Chataan on July 5 near the Marshall Islands." either remove the second or third part, it's too redundant IMO. YE Pacific Hurricane 00:52, 8 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
    • I disagree. It's key to mention the connection with Chataan, and explain where that is. It could've developed near Philippines and also affect Guam, but the fact that it took a similar path just a week later is pretty important. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:46, 8 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • "The storm disrupted relief efforts from Chataan, causing additional power outages but little damage." AFAIK you should put a comma before "but". YE Pacific Hurricane 00:52, 8 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
    • It's not necessary, and I think it flows better without it. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:46, 8 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • " deaths in the country." how many? YE Pacific Hurricane 00:52, 8 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
    • I deliberately avoided that in the lede, since it was an extended period of flooding in the country that can't be identified to one particular storm. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:46, 8 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • "In early July, a circulation developed along the monsoon trough near Enewetak Atoll, with an associated area of convection."I suggest re-wording this to "In early July, a circulation associated with convection developed along the monsoon trough near Enewetak Atoll.". YE Pacific Hurricane 00:52, 8 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • " The system removed nearly stationary,[3] tracking slowly to the southwest.[2] " read this sentence out loud plz. YE Pacific Hurricane 00:52, 8 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • "he agency classified Halong as extratropical. " already lined above, so delink. YE Pacific Hurricane 00:52, 8 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
    • Given how important becoming extratropical is to the lifetime of a tropical cyclone, I opted to link it a second time. Is that OK? I'd hardly call it overlinking. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:46, 8 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Any aftermath? YE Pacific Hurricane 00:52, 8 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • How come no see also section? YE Pacific Hurricane 00:52, 8 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Typhoon Halong (2002). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:21, 22 May 2017 (UTC)Reply