A fact from Type (designation) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 December 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the Type numbering system in Japan specified that the Mitsubishi A6M of 1940 would be designated "Type 0 Carrier Fighter", giving rise to the popular name "Zero"?
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
The etymology section in this article is within the scope of the Etymology Task Force, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of etymology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EtymologyWikipedia:WikiProject Linguistics/EtymologyTemplate:Etymology sectionEtymology articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Although the article's title simply mentions "designation" and the introduction notes that "Many other nations use the word 'Type' to designate products in a series" with no further qualification, the article is devoted to a discussion of (1) military weaponry (2) from three countries only. Either this article should be greatly expanded (admittedly, a huge job) or its title changed to a more restrictive scope, such as "Type (military designation)" or "Type (weapons)". The latter may be more appropriate.
--Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 15:59, 11 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
Expansion seems to me the answer. As for the article name, I took Mark (designation) as the model. Binksternet (talk) 16:23, 11 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
