Talk:Two-Mile Borris

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Why is "Baronies of Ireland" redundant, but not "Lists of towns in Ireland"? Neither is referenced in the body of the article. Yet both shed light on a higher order, of which the subject of the article is a member. The link to Barony is to the term in general, not to Ireland in particular. I think that the "See also" link should be restored. Laurel Lodged (talk) 23:32, 4 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

I am responding to the proposal to merge Twomileborris (electoral division) into Two-Mile Borris. This is a very bad idea, because the two articles deal with different concepts. Two-Mile Borris is a village, whereas the electoral division is a relatively large rural area which has its own history (deriving from the Poor Laws but still used for census and electoral purposes) and which, although it includes the village, also includes many other places. Amalgamating the electoral division article into the village article would make no more sense than, say, amalgamating the article for County Tipperary into the article for Tipperary Town.MartinCollin (talk) 19:48, 2 October 2012 (UTC)MartinCollinReply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Two-Mile Borris. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:22, 4 June 2017 (UTC)Reply