Talk:Twenty-five-thousander

Russia Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Soviet Union Low‑importance

	Soviet Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Agriculture Low‑importance

	Agriculture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Time period

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

The text said "in the early 1930." I changed it to "in the early 1930s." as that would be true even if what was meant was "in early 1930." However if someone can confirm the meaning (and adjust the article if necessary) that would be good. Rich Farmbrough 09:37 15 July 2006 (GMT).

Yes it was actually 1930. See e.g.: 1 --82.131.24.246 (talk) 10:15, 18 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

It's strange that the only half-critical sentence in the article reflects the official Soviet point of view on kulaks, not a scientific source. --82.131.24.246 (talk) 10:18, 18 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Post-2014 usage

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hasn't the term been resurrected since 2014 as a derogatory term to describe soldiers of the Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics, implying that they serve purely for the pay of 25,000 roubles a month, which is one of the few ways to make a living given the ruination of the economies there? --GCarty (talk) 20:01, 17 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic