Talk:Turkmenistan Ice Hockey Federation

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey articles

Turkmenistan Low‑importance

	Turkmenistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkmenistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkmenistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkmenistanWikipedia:WikiProject TurkmenistanTemplate:WikiProject TurkmenistanTurkmenistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Requested move 14 May 2018

Latest comment: 6 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the pages at this time, per the discussion below. Please feel free to reintroduce the request, with evidence of how the proposed titles are grounded in WP:AT policy and considerations like WP:COMMONNAME, in the future. Dekimasuよ! 22:00, 25 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

– These old names that consists of the names of governing bodies for ice hockey and members of the IIHF, so these articles should be moved. AaronWikia (talk) 04:45, 14 May 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. Iffy★Chat -- 10:25, 23 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Oppose all, would not object to relisting but see it as a bit pointless. There's no evidence offered that these name changes are in common English usage, and experience dealing with similar nominations indicates to me that they probably aren't yet. Andrewa (talk) 20:33, 21 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
Oppose Andrewa pretty much sums up my thoughts on it. -DJSasso (talk) 16:22, 23 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Discussion

AaronWikia, please read wp:correct and wp:official names and if you still think that these moves are justified in terms of the article name policy, provide evidence of this and I will not object to relisting. In fact it's a bit out of process but if this evidence is provided I'm happy to strike out my !vote and relist the RM myself. Andrewa (talk) 20:37, 21 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic