This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Agree & agree: move into mainspace in the next 48 hrs, after checking for optimal categories, etc... The community should do the rest. And, yes, even though I often find red links obnoxious, with the implication of "somebody bring me an article on this!", still, it's worthwhile on this one, as searching for Cornell potential takes you to somewhat parochially referenced paragraphs in Quarkonium#QCD_and_quarkonia. I think providing the judgment and the initiative to get it rolling is sufficient. We don't need to do everything in a "work in progress"..... Cuzkatzimhut (talk) 15:40, 19 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}
