This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bulgaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bulgaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BulgariaWikipedia:WikiProject BulgariaTemplate:WikiProject BulgariaBulgaria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
I've created the article Treaty of İstanbul (1913) . It is the correct name and it is seriously sourced. But some people like to move the name to Treaty of Constantinople (1913) , just because there are more internet hits for Constantinople than İstanbul. That kind of reasoning is meaningless. In internet you can see that most articles are mirrors of others. Once an incorrect information is entered the next day you can read the incorrect information in many other pages. Besides, the counting method is faulty. Hits for Treaty of İstanbul (1913) is not counted hits for treaty of İstanbul is counted ( which includes at least 7 more treaties all of which are older and some are actually named as Treaty of Constantinople). Well I am not going to accept internet hits as a serious guide for the naming.Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 14:29, 17 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
The above are not "internet hits", they are bibliography results. And the evidence of usage is overwhelming. Per WP:NAME we are bound to follow the most common form, not what one source uses. Constantine ✍ 14:52, 17 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
As long as I know, Erickson prefers modern Turkish names to other alternatives. But in this case, even Erickson uses "Treaty of Constantinople". Takabeg (talk) 15:22, 17 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Treaty of istanbul was signed between the Ottoman Empire and Bulgaria. But the accompanying table which has been added by an anonymous editor lists five other countries. This table doesn't belong to thıs article. Maybe it should be added to Balkan Wars article . I'll call the editor and wait for the reply.
Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 15:21, 3 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
It is also not clear what pre-war area the table refers to - WW1 (since it is amongst WW1 content) or Second Balkan War Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk) 17:34, 5 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
I guess it refers to Balkan Wars. But anyway, I removed the table. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 17:45, 5 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
.svg)
