Talk:Transmasculine reproduction

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Csmythe18 in topic Peer Review

Peer Review

edit

Cameron, Your Transmasculine Reproduction paragraph was a great starter, and it was very informative!! If there is a wiki page that discusses gender performance , you should link it to your wiki page. I think that will help individuals who do not understand it completely. Your last sentence in this section was extremely interesting. Therefore, I believe that you should elaborate more on the subject. What exactly do you mean when stating that the individuals lack cooperation from healthcare professionals- advice or?

Your last two paragraphs were very informative and very well written! I think one thing you could do is possibly link your wiki page to resources for these individuals. You could possible do an external links section where you could place these links. If you do this, it will give your audience further information that can be informal/formal. However, it would still give them more knowledge on the topic, and they could possibly benefit from these external links.

You are honestly off to a great start! I am impressed with this article. I also learned a lot myself. I did not know much about the topics you discussed. Your third and sixth sources are really good! It would be great if you could find more links like this that way you can add more information. It looks like a few of your other citations are personal narrative. This might be an issue with the wiki standard. However, if you cannot find any other reliable sources like your third and sixth one, I am sure those could still help shape your article very much. If you have any questions please let me know, also, I will post more advice or sources that I find based on your topic (if beneficial) if I happen to cross anything!

Hello Csmythe18! This article is very informative and thought-provoking! Your description about transmasculine reproduction is a strong definition. I like how you go on to explain characteristics of transmasculine individuals. I like the fluidity of your writing style! There are some sentences that might not come across as a neutral statement. For example (the last sentence of the article), “Doctors and health care *providers need to be more aware* of their transgender patients needs so they can properly treat them while respecting their gender identity so as to not create further gender dysmorphia.” Otherwise, I believe your article is remarkably comprehensible. I was able to pick out your heading titles from your first paragraph so it was insightful to read about those particular terms in more depth. As I was reading, I was curious as to when the term "transmasculine reproduction" may have been coined or was starting to be used. Perhaps creating a “Historical” section would be helpful to provide context on its development, but I understand that finding reliable resources may be difficult.

You have linked quite a few words already to other Wikipedia links, which is great to see how other ideas/terminology are interrelated. There are some other key words that you mentioned in the “chest feeding” and “sexual and reproductive health care” sections that you might be able to further link. If there’s no Wikipedia pages already started, I would create an “External Link” heading and list other notable websites for readers to examine. Below I found some other sources that might be helpful:

http://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1472-6963-12-110 http://www.nickgorton.org/Medical%20Therapy%20and%20HM%20for%20Transgender%20Men_2005.pdf http://dsm.psychiatryonline.org/doi/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.dsm14 http://tsq.dukejournals.org/content/1/1-2/267.full.pdf+html http://search.proquest.com/openview/5c9f76cd53bb0a39a61cb78633b7e445/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=32986

Great work with this article! P18 (talk) 02:55, 9 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks so much! Those were very helpful comments — Preceding unsigned comment added by Csmythe18 (talkcontribs) 22:16, 18 April 2017 (UTC)Reply