Talk:Tom Weisner/GA1
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Dana boomer in topic GA Review
GA Review edit
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi! I guess I'll take this one for review as well. I'm trying to work through some of the backlog in the politics section...it's insane to have to wait over a month and a half for a review... Dana boomer (talk) 01:25, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- I'd like to see another paragraph (about the same length as the one currently there) added to the lead.
- O.K. I summarized each out of state story.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 08:04, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not sure of the significance of the distance between Aurora and Chicago, and why it is important enough to need to mention it in the lead.
- O.K.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 07:30, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- In the Background section. Why was his resignation controversial? Was he trying to avoid censure/punishment for something? Was it his fault that the boil water order had to be issued?
- Removed offending words.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 07:44, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- In the Campaign section, "When the smoke cleared on the election in this municipality that spans four counties" is unencyclopedic, especially in its use of "this".
- O.K.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 07:41, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- Has there been any more recent news on Weisner's WiFi initiative? If this was a big thing for him, there really should be some sort of an update that's more recent than a year ago.
- Found.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 07:37, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- I'd like to see another paragraph (about the same length as the one currently there) added to the lead.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- A few prose and MOS issues, so I am placing this article on hold. Please let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 01:47, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- Looks good, so I'm passing the article to GA status. Nice work, and thanks for the prompt response. Dana boomer (talk) 18:19, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- A few prose and MOS issues, so I am placing this article on hold. Please let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 01:47, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
