Talk:Threni (Stravinsky)

Threni (Stravinsky) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 28, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

Classical music

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Threni (Stravinsky)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 20:30, 14 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
The lead should be longer. Content from the history, influence and movement section should be summarized in the lead.
Thanks, yes, so it should. I've expanded it to include those things. --Stfg (talk) 14:08, 28 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: The lead is the only major issue. --GoP _T ^C _N 12:34, 28 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Pass/Fail:

Errata edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Miss you, Jerome, along with Claudio Spies (1925 – April 2, 2020) who described materials he looked at.

My vocal score (B&H 18445) has the corrections found in the Library of Congress printer's proof. I still doubt whether the much marked up 'measure' 178 (image 22 at LoC) is correct: the tenor has a crochet on the 3rd syllable of "In tenebrosis collo-ca-vit" while the basso comes has a quaver. Sparafucil (talk) 10:20, 24 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic