Talk:ThinkEquity

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Wrong PROD argument edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

The given reason for deletion "no external sources" is wrong. A Google search excluding their own site ("ThinkEquity Partners" -site:thinkequity.com) gives many hits. Investmentments of $8.5 billion should give a hint for notability too. --Peter Eisenburger (talk) 18:26, 24 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I misunderstood the term "no external sources". However, since there are references on the Web, I placed the refimprove tag.--Peter Eisenburger (talk) 18:33, 24 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Add topic