This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles
The "reception" section is written in a too personal style, with an exaggerated and biased use of quotes to corroborate the author's personal opinion of the negative reception. The inappropriate use of extrapolated quotes to support a thesis can easily manipulate the reader's perception. Fede Ren88 (talk) 09:24, 21 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
The section was actually a little too verbose and partial (I'm sure not intentionally), so I edited it into a more essential and neutral version. LilyLilac88 (talk) 14:21, 21 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Removing all but one negative review and keeping the one positive review is not "neutrality", but false balance (WP:PROPORTION) and will be seen as disruptive editing at best and vandalism at worst. Rambling Rambler (talk) 15:00, 21 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
