Talk:Shakuntala (play)

Untitled

Does this story sound a bit like The Lord Of the Rings to anyone else but me? I wonder if this story partly/fully inspired LOTR!

Nope, not to me.

Mahabharata

The war in Mahabharata was not a civil war, it was a full blown battlefield war with thousands being killed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 90.194.242.67 (talk) 20:34, 7 May 2007 (UTC).

Yes, just like the American civil war and the English civil war. Paul B (talk) 13:12, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Requested moves

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was Move to Recognition of Śakuntalā The Recognition of Śakuntalā^{("The" is universally used)} per Ajax below. I feel that there's general stance that the current title is too unwieldy, and uncertainties in transliteration could be perhaps best solved by picking the scientific one (IAST). Duja► 09:48, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

---

This is the English Wikipedia and should use the common English title, The Recognition of Sakuntala. The Drama Llama 15:14, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

• Support. What more can one say? Septentrionalis PMAnderson 19:48, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
• Oppose - Doing a Google test (in English), the current psychedelic name appears to be more common in English. Reginmund 05:18, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Please supply your data; google is tricky to use without getting false positives. In this case, I suspect that many hits are pages that simply don't have the Language bits set. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 15:54, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
    • Oops! I just realized it should be Shakuntala not Sakuntala. That's why the Google hits were lower. I have corrected the move request accordingly. The Drama Llama 02:12, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
      • Not at all clear which we should use. The NYUPress translation (2006) uses Shakuntala, the Oxford translation of 2001 uses Śakuntal-a, and Sakuntala is not uncommon. Probably Shakuntala for now to match the text, but Ś or S are better treatments of the Sanscrit. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 21:57, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
        • I looked to see if there was a policy about which transliteration method to use for Sanskrit, but I couldn't find one. The Drama Llama 22:10, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support a move to Recognition of Shakuntala but would prefer Recognition of Śakuntalā (and a more widespread use of IAST at Wikipedia in general). — AjaxSmack 00:49, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

19th century Europe

Should be more about how this was one of the first Indian works to develop a following in Europe as literature (i.e. not as religious scripture), the Goethe connection, European stagings of the play, etc. AnonMoos (talk) 15:03, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Yup. Feel free to add it to the article; it's uncontroversial and we can always find sources. (The article already briefly mentions that "The play was the first Indian drama to be translated into a Western language ".) Shreevatsa (talk) 15:37, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Shakuntala (play)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

The details about the translations needs to be more complete. It is known that there are transalations into several Indian languages and some European languages as well. This needs to be mentioned. --K N Unni (talk) 16:33, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Last edited at 16:33, 8 February 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 06:30, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

The redlink above should be Talk:Abhijñānaśākuntalam/Comments ([1]). --Francis Schonken (talk) 11:42, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Shakuntala (play). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722035418/http://www.indologica.it/volumi/doc_XXXI/08_Levitt.pdf to http://www.indologica.it/volumi/doc_XXXI/08_Levitt.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111228010453/http://www.uiowa.edu/~incinema/RamTeriGM.html to http://www.uiowa.edu/~incinema/RamTeriGM.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080215085741/http://www.kerala.gov.in/dept_culture/books.htm to http://www.kerala.gov.in/dept_culture/books.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130509171350/http://www.movietrailerlive.com/ct_0001_HarbourfrontCentreWorldStage to http://www.movietrailerlive.com/ct_0001_HarbourfrontCentreWorldStage

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:54, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Change defaultsort to Shakuntala?

It seems odd that an article entitled Shakuntala in English is sorted under the Devanagari version of the title, Abhijnanasakuntalam; in other words, on lists it appears under the letter A rather than S. In the code, this is {{DEFAULTSORT:Abhijnanasakuntalam}} near the bottom of the page. Are there compelling reasons to keep an article in English, on en.wikipedia, sorted this way? BlackcurrantTea (talk) 08:46, 25 October 2018 (UTC)