This article was tagged for speedy deletion under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion but a reviewing administrator or uninvolved experienced editor (Spicy (talk)) declined the request on the basis that: this is a valid archaic spelling: see wikt:quene. merits discussion at RFD rather than speedy deletion imo. This article should not be tagged again for speedy deletion under the same criterion and, unless a valid, separate speedy deletion basis exists, further attempts at deleting this article should be made via the proposed deletion process (prod) if uncontroversial, or the article taken to articles for deletion (AfD) for debate on the merits. Note: this template should be removed once the associated article has survived an AfD debate; or has been significantly changed such that further speedy deletion requests are unlikely. |
Contested deletion
editThis redirect should not be speedy deleted as an implausible typo or misnomer, because, while it may seem to be a mispelling now it was the historical spelling of the word. In addition Quene redirects to Queen, so why should The Quene not redirect to The Queen? --Estar8806 (talk) 18:18, 7 May 2023 (UTC)