Talk:The Mini Page

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

I'd been meaning to start a Mini Page page for ever! I just checked back in and see that you started one yesterday! I tip my hat to you!!! PurpleChez 01:55, 20 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

There should be more about criticism of the Mini Page; today's edition in our local paper had a rather one-sided view of China, without so much as one word about human rights. 1.618033989 (talk) 12:42, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

If you have a reliable source about criticism directed towards the Mini Page, feel free to add that information with the proper citation. Every statement in the article is factual, cited and unbiased; it doesn't include any statement suggesting that no one has ever criticized the Mini Page or found fault with it. Even if there were hundreds of editorials denouncing the Mini Page, it wouldn't affect the truth of any of the information currently in the article, that I can see (although, obviously, information about such criticism should be added if it exists). I am therefore removing the NPOV tag, unless you can point to specific non-neutral statements. Propaniac (talk) 13:57, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic