Talk:The Michaels Companies

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Sam Perkins in topic Proposed merge with The Michaels Companies

Merging with Michaels edit

I say go ahead and do it! It looks like not many people edit Leewards anyway. Corkythehornetfan (talk) 22:37, 24 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • @Corkythehornetfan: The amount of people editing a page has no bearing on the notability. There are multiple sources discussing Leewards outside the context of its merger with Michaels. It was a notable chain on its own before it merged with a more prominent one. Would you say that Galyan's doesn't need its own article because fewer people edit it than Dick's Sporting Goods? Leewards needs expansion, not merging. I created it as a stub in hopes of getting back to it later once I find more to build it with. Retail articles as a whole are barely ever edited around here because so few have an interest in it. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 09:27, 8 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Any update on IPO? Very old info.

Proposed merge with The Michaels Companies edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was to merge the Michaels Stores page with a new entry on the Michaels Companies and redirect to that entry. Sam Perkins (talk) 17:27, 30 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

some content needs to be merged DGG ( talk ) 10:01, 17 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Will do, shortly. Sam Perkins (talk) 20:11, 18 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

I think it makes more sense for the company article to be the target. TJRC (talk) 00:32, 19 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
At first I didn't agree (bec Michaels Stores better known that the Company) but I see it will be cleaner and more logical. I'll switch the material over to the company entry.Sam Perkins (talk) 20:37, 22 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

I merged Michaels Stores into The Michaels Companies as suggested. It's much cleaner. As this is my first merge, there may still be issues, so have a look when you can. Thanks, TJRC.Sam Perkins (talk) 01:24, 23 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

The merger proposal and discussion is outlined above; the merger was made, followed by a week's waiting period for further comment. Sam Perkins (talk) 17:27, 30 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.