Talk:The Interpreter (2005 film)

Untitled

Tobin Keller actually was sent to protect the President of the Democratic Republic of Matobo, Edmond Zuwanie; not Silvia Broome as the article suggests. He later began protecting Broome, but not until after the first attempt on her life. --202.74.201.171 04:10, 2 May 2005 (UTC)

Dual Citizenship

Could someone who's seen the film please clarify where Silvia Broome shares dual citzenship with as well as Matobo? 2001:388:1034:1D01:2E0:C5FF:FE3A:308C (talk) 12:06, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Rewritten Plot

I've created a complete rewrite of the plot summary that better conveys the plot of the film and corrects some details in the current one. This rewrite also involves removing the last sentence under the Matobo and Ku section, since the rewrite covers it. The changed content appears on this page in my sandbox. Since this represents a major change to the article, I'm leaving this open for comments on the associated talk page for three days; assuming no objections are raised, I'll then go ahead and apply the changes. — digitaleon • talk @ 12:55, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Note: I've updated the plot summary on the sandbox page linked above to improve its' clarity. FYI. — digitaleon • talk @ 12:29, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Rewritten plot & other changes incorporated (diff) — digitaleon • talk @ 10:16, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Interpreterthe.jpg

Image:Interpreterthe.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:57, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Plot Adjustment

I've removed the words "during in which the United Nations was in a time of crisis" from the second paragraph of the Plot. The words were placed in such a way as to confuse the issue, and don't appear to relate to the film itself; the situation within the UN concerning the indictment was politically charged, certainly, and different agendas were in play, but there was no crisis as I saw it. However, anyone who feels the above words should be re-added is free to do so, and I won't revert it. — digitaleon • talk @ 07:13, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Nicole interpreter.jpg

Image:Nicole interpreter.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

On Jan 5 2008 I added an full and complete fair use rationale. User User:East718 deleted the image on Jan 11 2008 without a "Nomination for Deletion" despite there being a disputed fair use rationale. I have followed up on his talk page and will escalate if the image is not put through an appropriate Nomination for Deletion review as per Wikipedia:FURG and Wikipedia:NFCC.

CraigWyllie (talk) 00:28, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Problem resolved - it seems that when I added the fair use rationale I should have removed the "disputed images" category that was applied to it (and the notice regarding the lack of rationale I presume too). I will restore the image to the article. CraigWyllie (talk) 00:51, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Mugabe and Zuwanie

Why was this section removed? I for one think it certainly warrants a place in the article, as the parallels are unmistakable. Bardiak (talk) 01:36, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

WP:OR Darrenhusted (talk) 09:06, 25 November 2008 (UTC)