Talk:The Frying Game

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleThe Frying Game has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starThe Frying Game is part of the The Simpsons (season 13) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 9, 2011Good article nomineeListed
February 6, 2012Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

How?

edit

How do we know this? The thing 20:59, 3 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Magic. 129.96.234.196 02:52, 11 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

ali/anti lock brakes.

edit

out of curiosity, isn't the reference to muhammad ali and anti lock brakes a reference to ali and foreman, the latter of whom is now spokesman for midas? 72.128.213.48 03:32, 15 August 2007 (UTC)August 14, 2007Reply

Caterpillar?

edit

When the show pans over the audience right before Homer's execution, it focuses on a little caterpillar that laughs a little evil laugh. Who is that little bugger?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.63.50.187 (talk) 00:30, 23 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Clearly you haven't seen the whole episode. It was for injuring the caterpillar that Homer was doing community service in the first place, which is how he met Mrs Bellamy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.146.55.102 (talk) 13:20, 22 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Game?

edit

Wouldn't it be useful to also point out that this episode is basically a parody of "The Game"? Or is that left out because it might spoil the episode or that movie?

It isn't listed probably due to a lack of a reliable source verifying your claim. Note Wikipedia:Spoiler and Wikipedia:No disclaimers in articles, we don't use notes saying "plot spoiler" or similar. CTJF83 11:51, 12 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:The Frying Game/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: That Ole Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 10:36, 3 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Review will be coming very shortly. Thanks That Ole Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 10:36, 3 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

  • In Production, the whole start to the second paragraph is unreferenced, please ref it up.
Not at all! It's just that all that text uses the same ref, (ref 1) so reffing each sentence or whatever would be rather redundant.
  • That's the only thing I could find in the entire article that could be faulted, this is fantastic work.
Thanks! :D
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    As I've said, I couldn't find one single spelling error or poorly structured sentence... and that's my specialty.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   (citations to reliable sources):   (OR):  
    Perfic'.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   (focused):  
    Perfic'
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
    Perfic'.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
    Perfic'.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

That was the best Good Article Nom I've ever reviewed. Good job to the nominator!! Just one tiny thing to do and it's through.

That Ole Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 10:50, 3 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Wow, thanks! And thanks for the review! I think it's pretty much good to go, unless you have found some other concern? :) Queenieacoustic (talk)

Wonderful stuff! That Ole Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 20:13, 9 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on The Frying Game. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:49, 18 June 2017 (UTC)Reply