Talk:The Dark Redemption

Latest comment: 7 years ago by 122.108.141.214 in topic Rationale for deletion

Untitled

edit

For some reason this article has been marked for deletion. While admittedly this page is not currently overflowing with information (it's a work in progress, and I wanted to save before I got too far), I don't understand why this page should be deleted. It's an article about a Star Wars fan film, no different than the articles about Crazy Watto and George Lucas in Love. What could possibly be the reasons for deletion, not to mention a speedy one? -- TomakaLinus 03:11, 18 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Not the person who flagged it, here, but you might wanna add the 'hangon' tag like mentioned in the pink box. that said, I think I support the article staying, mostly because of the reprised role bit. Cantras 03:13, 18 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
OK. Thanks for catching that. -- TomakaLinus 03:19, 18 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion

edit

This article was nominated for speedy deletion. I have removed the tag because a Google News Archive search shows independent coverage of the film. [1]. However, it is likely to be nominated for deletion unless references are provided from reliable sources. Capitalistroadster 06:49, 18 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

OK, that's reasonable. I added your Google link plus a link to IMDB, as well as a link to the film itself on TheForce.Net. I also expanded the plot description a bit, so that the page is not just a tab. If anything else is required, just let me know. Thanks. -- TomakaLinus 16:00, 18 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Rationale for deletion

edit

Does not meet general notability guidelines nor film-specific notability guidelines. Google News hits indicated by previous objectors to deletion are passing mentions, and do not discuss the film in depth. --122.108.141.214 (talk) 03:04, 6 June 2017 (UTC)Reply