Talk:The Concept of Mind

Dubious

Not really dubious, more of a clarification: In the article it is claimed: "The reader must assume that Ryle himself is not misusing concepts when he employs metaphors of space, such as set, geography, relocation, replacing, preceding, following, and taking cross-bearings, in order to communicate his logic regarding concepts and categories. It is then to be taken for granted that the concept logic can lawfully be a member of the category (logical type) space."

Is this his claim out of the book, or is this commentary? Briholt 23:17, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

This sounds like a commentary. I'll remove it. Even if this criticism can be sourced, it should be put in a criticism section, not in the introduction. Tweisbach (talk) 05:32, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Mind-Body

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 January 2023 and 31 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Bouhan12.

— Assignment last updated by Salma.btk1 (talk) 15:27, 1 March 2023 (UTC)