Talk:The Cadfael Chronicles
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Prairieplant in topic No sources, possibly OR
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Untitled edit
split from Cadfael per suggestion. Accotink2 talk 13:12, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
More than Start class article edit
This article is more than Start class. It is well-written, with citations. I hope it can be reviewed and raised up in class. --Prairieplant (talk) 16:21, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
No sources, possibly OR edit
On the contrary to the poster above: the article cites barely no sources and states a lot of unsourced facts and opinions. Basically two thirds of it should be omitted by WP guidelines in the near future, if someone doesnt work in sources. (I am not able to do this.) 95.90.129.104 (talk) 10:54, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
- There is a list of references in the article. It describes the series of novels, and there is an article with reference to book reviews for each novel. The Bibliography includes a book or two written about the series. Once the television shows began to air, a summary of the connection between them and the novels is made. The main source of notability of the series is the reviews of each novel, and those articles are linked to this one. I still find this a well-written article, not original research but with obvious sources. --Prairieplant (talk) 18:49, 3 December 2022 (UTC)