Talk:The Boy Least Likely To
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
twee pop/indie rock? edit
Does anyone really see this band fitting into either of these categories. I saw them live last year and would say that just 'pop' is a better categorization. Mainstream pop at that.--Michig 10:38, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Indie pop seems most appropriate. WesleyDodds 04:16, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- To be fair, they -are- on an independent record label ;) http://www.tooyoungtodierecords.com/TYTDR_1104/links.html indie twee pop etc is fairly accurate. Imran (talk) 15:38, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Added an infobox edit
Hooray, I'm helping!Jacobus 04:42, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Release date? edit
It's past 'this summer' - any ideas? 141.161.69.232 (talk) 05:09, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
Trivia edit
I know that pages strive to remove "Trivia" sections. However, I feel that there was a lot of good information lost in that trivia section that was culled a while ago. Any way we can put some of it back in a way that adheres to the "No Trivia" Rule, rather than just removing it all together? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Barmy Fotheringay-Phipps (talk • contribs) 06:41, 10 January 2010 (UTC)