Talk:The Block (Australian TV series)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Block (Australian TV series) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Individual season pages edit
It has come to my attention that season 4 is the only one to have its own individual page. I'm just wondering why that is. Why aren't there pages for the other 3 seasons? TheTribeHasSpoken (talk) 08:43, 12 July 2011 (UTC) Have headlined the sections again for mobile use friendly access. If you use a mobile device you can now easily navigate the sections. Someone keeps changing this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pipera (talk • contribs) 20:18, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Non-free image use edit
Non-free images are almost never allowed to be used in image galleries per WP:NFG because such use is considered to be primarily decorative and lacking the context required by WP:NFCC#8. There was no sourced article content discussing the changes made to logos over the various seasons so there was really reason that seeing these logos would significantly improve the reader's understanding to such a degree that not seeing the logos would be detrimental to that undersanding. Moreover. each of the logos is being used in the stand-alone articles about the seasons where they were first used, so the a link to those articles (item 6 of WP:NFC#UUI and WP:NFCC#1) is more than sufficient if the purpose is simply for the reader to see the logos. Each logo was also lacking the separate specific non-free use rationale required by WP:NFCC#10c for use in this article, so the files could've simply been removed for that reason alone per WP:NFCCE. It might be possible for some of the files to be re-added, but the non-free use issues should be addressed and the files should be better incorporated into the article near relevant sourced article content, and not simply re-added as an image gallery. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:32, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Shocking! edit
Terrible reality tv, promoting bullying,nasty and vicious behaviour for our children to see, shame on promoting this behaviour 120.21.76.41 (talk) 11:15, 30 September 2023 (UTC)