Talk:The Apprentice (American TV series) season 7

Page deletion

Please note to those that see that this is a page that has been deleted before: The page was originally created back during the airing of "The Apprentice 6" when it was thought there would be a 7th season. Donald Trump had said he quit the show and thus the show was canceled. However, news during around July 15-20, 2007 has shown that the show has been brought back for at least a 7th season, and thus this page should not be deleted. --Masem 23:36, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

John Cena

sites are reporting everywhere that hell be on it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.129.220.188 (talk) 01:28, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

"Floating Around" vs. "Confirmed"

Please do not revert the page... there is a huge difference between "floating around" and "confirmed". This is why Wikipedia is such a goddamn mess. Sources are misquoted in translation. Have some integrity please. 71.105.240.19 19:54, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Candidates table

Keeping the Team in a separate column lets users sort by team as well as by surname (results, etc.) as they see fit. —MJBurrage^(T•C) 18:21, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Hometown

Is this meant to be where they were a) born, b) grew up, or c) live now? For Gene Simmons that would be a) Haifa, Israel, b) New York City (starting age 8), and c) Beverly Hills, California. —MJBurrage^(T•C) 19:06, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Teams

It was pointed out to me that past seasons used a different format, and after reviewing the related pages I noticed that team assignments change periodically. (Obviously I have not watched past seasons very closely.)
Based on this, I would suggest removing team assignments from the Candidates table entirely, and only including it in the Weekly results table. If inconsistency bothers people then I would further suggest implementing a similar change in the past seasons. —MJBurrage^(T•C) 21:20, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Name of article

I think the article name needs to be changed, since the current title is rather confusing. The title, "The Celebrity Apprentice (US Season 7)" implies that it is the seventh season of "Celebrity Apprentice", not the seventh season of "the Apprentice". --Madchester (talk) 07:09, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Yep, I agree. There's no need for the disambiguatory brackets if this is the only article called "The Celebrity Apprentice". However, there needs to be some work done on agreeing on a standard name for each season, it's a bit all over the place at the moment. Seaserpent⁸⁵ 15:57, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Each season should be "The Apprentice (U.S. Season #)". (note the periods in US), with redirects from "Celebrity Apprentice" for this version or "The Apprentice LA" from 6th season. The first part of the lead can state "The Celebritity Apprentice is the 7th season of the American television show The Apprentice..." --MASEM 16:04, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

I have been WP:BOLD and moved the page to "The Apprentice (U.S. Season 7)" per the above. --MASEM 19:29, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Ratings section

I added a ratings sections, but I wanted something other than a bullet list, like a table or something, or just text. Can someone re-do this for me? Thanks. Tonymci2 (talk) 02:47, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

It looks like the Ratings section has disappeared. The last user to mess with that section was "24.86.120.100", but didn't leave an explanation. Please tell me why you took down a section I've been working on? Tonymci2 (talk) 07:53, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

I would like to see the ratings section back. Imperialmint (talk) 20:52, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

I agree, being a tv show and a business the Apprentice is reliant on ratings for money. This is a very important aspect of the show and should be included along with the cumulative amount of money donated to each charity. HotOne121 (talk) 03:46, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Weird how no one has reverted that user's edit. --staka (T ・C) 03:51, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Judges

Instead of having the judges section as it is now (which seems a bit of a mess, with unconfirmed information and stuff in it), can we remove that section and move the information above? I'm thinking, in each episode summary, just add an extra line saying (for example, episode 4) "Judges: Donald Trump, Ivanka Trump, Vince McMahon". Granted, maybe we don't need to list Donald since it's a given that he's there every episode, and Ivanka might also end up being there every week this year, but I still listed them for completeness. Thoughts? --Maelwys (talk) 16:31, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

I agree. Adding a line in each week's summary for the judges that week makes more sense than having a separate section.Davehi1 (talk) 16:36, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

SKEPTICAL!

How does anyone know who will be fired in Week 12 or 13? Someone's implying that Piers is the winner if you look at the winner's table. I'm pretty skeptical of that information. If no one can verify this, I'm going to take it down.

Donations

Do you think it would be possible to include a section or a field in the episode summaries indicating the amount of money that was donated to each charity? Sweet Pea 1981 (talk) 23:28, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Trace Wins?

Where did whoever write this get that information? Is it fact or speculation? 71.158.239.174 (talk) 05:01, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Well he did win.. it is now a fact. --staka (T ・C) 03:51, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Actually, Piers won [1]. dearly (talk) 16:21, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, nevermind.. haha. I meant Piers. --staka (T ・C) 01:34, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Elimination Chart

Does the article really needs it? Weekly Results seems to cover all the relevant info about the candidates' performance, and it's much more organized.201.53.68.54 (talk) 20:19, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

The Apprentice World-wide WikiProject

Please contribute to the relevant discussion here, as this discussion relates to this article. Thanks, Dalejenkins | 15:45, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Apprentice (U.S. season 7). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070821100414/http://community.tvguide.com/blog-entry/TVGuide-News-Blog/Todays-News/Rosie-Answers-Apprentice/800018697 to http://community.tvguide.com/blog-entry/TVGuide-News-Blog/Todays-News/Rosie-Answers-Apprentice/800018697
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120102082843/http://www.bsqu.com/ourcompany/industryawards.html to http://www.bsqu.com/ourcompany/industryawards.html/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:38, 5 May 2017 (UTC)