Talk:Thaidene Nëné National Park Reserve

Other references

More references to incorporate into the article:

• Washington Post article
• CBC article
• NY Times article
• WWF Canada press release (from Marketwire)
• Parks Canada press release
• Proposed national park (from Parks Canada)
• Interim land withdrawls (from Parks Canada)
• Ramparts wetland (from Parks Canada)
• The Associated Press article - discusses pipeline

Not a park

This area is not a national park although it has been proposed. It is safe to call it a protected area. See [1]. –droll [chat] 02:20, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Thaidene Nene National Park Reserve (proposed). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071123013955/http://www.canada.com:80/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=e2d14597-911d-409e-9305-4a55713f6bb5 to http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=e2d14597-911d-409e-9305-4a55713f6bb5
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.parcscanada.pch.gc.ca/docs/pc/rpts/etat-state-2001/sec5/par2_e.asp
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/October2006/13/c7886.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:42, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 20 March 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved (closed by non-admin page mover) SITH (talk) 16:28, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

---

Thaidene Nene National Park Reserve → Thaidene Nëné National Park Reserve – Looking for opinions on this rather than boldly moving it myself. Official Canadian government sources consistently spell the name of this proposed park as "Thaidene Nëné", however most independent sources drop the diacritics. MOS:DIACRITICS is not prescriptive one way or the other, only advising consistency between title and content. Which should it be? Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 14:59, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Support Regards Cowdy001 (talk) 20:25, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Support Strangely ouldn't find anything from the people of Łutselk'e as to their preference. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:12, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.