Talk:Terminal value (finance)
Latest comment: 14 years ago by 204.74.20.14 in topic Perpetuity Growth Model
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Definition of Enterprise value?
editThe definition of Enterprise value in this article and in the article about Enterprise value don't seem to correspond. Why? At least one of the articles must clearly be adjusted. The question is only which one and how. --Smallchanges 15:50, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Perpetuity Growth Model
editSomehow it doesn't make sense to me that "g" would be subtracted from "k" in the Perpetuity Growth Model. It seems much more natural to simply divide the cash flow with "(1+k/100)^n" to get the present value of a future cash flow. Or am I missing something? --Smallchanges 16:13, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
- The perpetuity growth model is consistent with most texts on the subject. Mathmatically this formula is incorrect however. For a stable growth rate business, the equation is correctly stated at CFn/(((1+k)/(1+g))-1) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.74.20.14 (talk) 15:15, 3 September 2010 (UTC)