This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Thailand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Thailand-related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Thailand-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.ThailandWikipedia:WikiProject ThailandTemplate:WikiProject ThailandThailand articles
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I'm about to remove the prod, to contest it. The prod is made on two grounds:
Unreliable sources. This is not, in itself, a reason to delete, it's a reason to improve the sources. Per WP:MILUNIT (an essay not a policy, I appreciate) battalion-sized formations are usually notable, and in this case it is a special forces unit which makes it more likely to be notable. I don't feel this is uncontroversial enough that a prod is appropriate. If it is to be deleted, it should be after scrutiny at AFD.
Content copy-pasted and translated from Thai. I am not sure if this is a claim of copyvio, or just poor English. If copyvio, the proper process should be followed, but a Prod isn't it. If it's just poor English, then I would tend to agree, but this can be fixed without deletion. Hugsyrup (talk) 12:19, 24 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
