Talk:Tamás
(Redirected from Talk:Tamás (name))
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Extraordinary Writ in topic Requested move 22 November 2022
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | On 22 November 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Tamás (name) to Tamás. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 22 November 2022 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Tamás (name) → Tamás – There is nothing but a redirect at Tamás. Faster than Thunder (talk | contributions) 05:18, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose. The proposed standalone main title header "Tamás" [with the diacritic] would be insufficiently differentiated from the disambiguation page which has "Tamas" [without the diacritic] as its main header. I would, however, support merging contents of the Tamás (name) page into the Tamas dab page. Tamás [with the diacritic] should redirect to the Tamas dab page, rather than to Tamás (name). —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 06:22, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support per WP:SMALLDETAILS. The spelling with diacritics is a distinct topic from ones without it.—Bagumba (talk) 08:49, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
- This has been effectively using WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT since many years ago. I think the acute is visible enough, esp. in the heading rendering. The visibility issue would primarily affect its listing in a condensed list at Tamas, and there we have the caption in the rest of the line to clarify to anyone who might not notice the acute that it's about this particular name (with its own spelling and pronunciation). Whoever is actually searching for "Tamás" has been pointed here between 2011 and 2012 and between 2015 and the present day with no issue, so I don't think we should disambiguate that usage - it is not ambiguous, only "Tamas" is. We should not merge the anthroponymy article back into the disambiguation page because that would go against standard practice described at WP:NAMELIST. Support --Joy [shallot] (talk) 17:47, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support. A clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for this spelling, and sufficiently distinct from Tamas under WP:SMALLDETAILS. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 16:32, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.