Talk:Tails Adventure

Latest comment: 5 years ago by MWright96 in topic GA Review

Translate from Español edit

I decided to be bold and translate the Spanish Wiki's intro to English. It's a little rough, but with a little help it can be fine. --SonicChao talk 16:15, 26 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Reception edit

Does anybody know about this game's reception? I feel that the article is incomplete without it. - Up and over for a six! (talk) 23:06, 10 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Reception about this game is absent from the internet. Formerly Codename Colorado | The Earwig (User | Talk | Contributions) 03:11, 21 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tails Adventure/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 10:05, 4 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Shall review this article. MWright96 (talk) 10:05, 4 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Development and release edit

  • The North American release date need to have its citation needed tag addressed in the prose and the infobox

Reception edit

  • " Mean Machines Sega agreed, calling it "decidedly unoriginal" and," - From my perspective, it appears that there is something missing from this section of text. If so, please rectify it
  • "1UP.com called Tails Adventures and Tails Skypatrol" - Adventure

References edit

  • Perhaps you could consider archiving References 3 and 13 like you have done with the other online sources

Overall, a beautifully written article. Only a few minor nit picks prevent an automatic promotion to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 18:08, 4 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

@MWright96: Thank you. I fixed all items. TarkusABtalk 12:28, 5 January 2019 (UTC)Reply