This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
About Steiner's book is that there is no mention of Raymond Firth's, The Work of the Gods in Tikopia, published in the 30s. That has extremely detailed material on taboo, mana and whatnot, but Firth's finesse as a field analyst of data, one who was dismissive of theory as something that could embrace all of a given phenomenon, probably meant Franz couldn't fit him into the critical mould about 'Western' imperialist ethnography. In turn, at least to judge from the indexes of the revised edition with Firth published in 1967, Firth ignored Steiner, who doesn't figure there, as far as I can gain from checking the bibliography and indexes. Not that observing this is useful for this article.Nishidani (talk) 17:46, 7 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
,_early_1900s,_Central_Africa,_Democratic_Republic_of_the_Congo,_Pende_people,_wood,_fiber_-_Cleveland_Museum_of_Art_-_DSC08700.JPG){kind=small}
