Talk:TCP hole punching
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the TCP hole punching article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 12 November 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Unnamed section edit
"TCP hole punching is a commonly-used NAT traversal technique" Commonly? Where? The article does not list one example use. And is, pardon the expression, crap. The deletion discussion suggested cleanup, but after years passed, it is still a mess. Delete, if no improvement in, let's say, one month. --Xerces8 (talk) 23:44, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Maybe this can be a reference for this page: A New Method for Symmetric NAT Traversal in UDP and TCP 129.104.247.2 (talk) 03:12, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
Carrier-grade NAT edit
It would be good to have a link to, or at least an explanation of the meaning of, "Carrier-grade NAT".
BTW, yes, the article is technical, but the subject matter is technical. I'm glad the article is here, even if I wish it had more information. The way to improve it would be to add more information, more links, more references, not to delete it as was apparently suggested.Ifdef (talk) 22:05, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Real world numbers for A is non-predictable and B is non-predictable, resulting in "NO" edit
Please provide a real world numbers. How high is the percentage if you take two random consumer internet endpoints that the tcp hole puching is not possible (since both are non-predictable). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.246.166.50 (talk) 05:35, 6 May 2015 (UTC)