Talk:Sweet itch

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Alchemist-81 in topic Promotion

86.9.70.23 08:18, 21 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

'Bold text'Bold textHI MY NAME IS MAGGIE, I HAVE A HORSE CALLED ELLA, SH HAS SWEET ITCH. FOR TWO YEARS I HAVE TRIEDMANY LOTIONS AND POTIONS AND HAVE FOUND ONE THAT WORKS, ITS NETEX, THE CREAM IN A TUB. EVERYDAY I BRUSH THE CREAM INTO HER MANE AND ALONGSIDE OF HER MANE, BASE OF TAIL. I DO THIS EVERY DAY ALLL YEAR ROUND, AND ONLY LEAVE OFF THIS ROUTINE WHEN ITS REALLY WINDY. I ALSO USE NETEX FLY SPRAY ON TAIL, UNDER BELLY, ALONG SIDE OF BODY, AND BETWEEN HER GROIN, AND A LIGHT SPRAY ON MANE, HER MANE IS NOW THREE INCHES LONG, AND MOST OF ALL MY HORSE IS SO MUCH HAPPIER, HOW UNCOMFORTABLE SHE MUST HAVE BEEN.. SHE IS RISING SIX AND THIS YEAR WE ARE GOING TO START TRAINING WESTERN STYLE

WITH MY YOUNGER HORSE SPIRIT WHO I BOUGHT UP FROM THREE WEEKS OLD AFTER HIS MOTHER DIED.

WILL UPDATE THIS PAGE SOON. MY E-MAIL ADDRESS IS maggiebrowns30@yahoo.co.uk


                                        maggie   86.9.70.23 08:18, 21 March 2007 (UTC)←Reply

I think this might be promotional material, Maggie - see the Wikipedia guidelines. Dlh-stablelights 13:17, 15 June

2007 (UTC)

Name edit

So why is it called "sweet itch" anyway? Is it a corruption of "sweat?" Atypicaloracle (talk) 08:21, 16 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

I have had success defending against bites by using a heavy application of suntan oil, not sunscreen, but clear type tanning oil applied heavily to the point of actually running down. It traps the little buggers like fly paper, but doesn't allow them to bite. It is messy, but serves well for outdoor work. Such use might work for livestock. Soap and water afterwards cleans the oil and trapped midges off. Where I live in SE US, we are plagued by the tiny, almost invisible variety that lives near salt water creeks and marshes.97.80.241.12 (talk) 22:01, 14 September 2011 (UTC)AndyReply

Promotion edit

The paragraph on immunotherapy appears to be promotion for a particular product by BioEos. there is no scientific consensus that this product is now the gold standard of care, thus it is as good or bad as other comparable approaches (for the purpose of Wikipedia). Deleted the product description. Alchemist-81 (talk) 06:45, 13 September 2018 (UTC)Reply