This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Surafend massacre article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
A fact from Surafend massacre appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 August 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
Surafend massacre is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The introduction in Context is extremely POV. Furthermore by suggesting that responsibility lay with General Allenby it is also rather far-fetched.JohnC (talk) 06:24, 25 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
It's not clear which section or what text you mean is extremely POV, but feel free to edit or remove anything you feel is non-neutral, or let me know so I can edit it. There is no suggestion in the text that General Allenby was responsible for the massacre, although as Commander-in-Chief of the Division I suppose he could be held indirectly responsible for the division's conduct, but I'm not sure what you mean here either. Please elaborate so I can amend the article accordingly. --Canley (talk) 06:43, 25 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
According to Khalidi, 1992, both Sarafand al-Amar and the smaller Sarafand al-Kharab were, at one time, burned. According to Khalidi, p. 413: "During the late 1920s Sarafand al-Kharab was briefly reduced to ruins once again, after British forces burned it. This was in retaliation for the killing of British soldiers who had entered the village drunk, violating the sensibilities of the inhabitants and, apparently, committing some offense that enraged the villagers. Many were displaced by this incident.."