Talk:Suminia

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animals Low‑importance

Suminia is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

Coexisted with Estemmenosuchus? edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

The Wiki page says it first appeared 268 million years ago, so why is that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.40.241.62 (talk) 03:10, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Suminia is known from 268 million to 252 million years ago in the fossil record, Estemmenosuchus is known from 267 million years ago, hence they probably coexisted in the areas their fossils overlaps. Larrayal (talk) 00:16, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

I'm not entirely sure what's being asked here, as far as it relates to the article. The range of time reported for a fossil taxon usually represents uncertainty over the exact time when the species lived; it does not necessarily indicate they coexisted. Estemmenosuchus is known from the Ocher faunal subassemblage and Suminia is known from the Sokolki faunal assemblage; this suggests that the two did not coexist, as the two assemblages do not overlap in time. Ornithopsis (talk) 00:23, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

On a note, I don't know why this question was asked in the first place, as nowhere in their pages it is stated that the two species were contemporaneous. Larrayal (talk) 13:24, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic