This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This entry lacks any third-party sourcing, relying solely of the Review website. Entries should be sourced by reputable, third party sources, with ONE reference to the source site per entry.
I've eliminated the online section (which was strictly advertising) and am considering pruning the Donahue Lecture Series unless third party sourcing can verify the Wiki-worthiness of this section. Looking at the user handles, they are a combo of anonymous, deleted, and "Suffolk University Law Review"-only updaters -- in other words, each year's editor. If that is the case, more attention needs to be paid to the Wiki rules and not just to what relevant content each editor wants to present. Please start contributing by the rules or understand that your entry will be cut up. --Stlamanda (talk) 14:26, 17 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
