Talk:Straub v. BMT by Todd
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Cwmhiraeth in topic Did you know nomination
 | A fact from Straub v. BMT by Todd appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 March 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:15, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that in his dissent in the Straub v. BMT by Todd case, Indiana Supreme Court Justice Roger Owen DeBruler argued that if someone else promises to pay your share of child support, then their promise should be considered legally binding? Source: https://law.justia.com/cases/indiana/supreme-court/1994/10s04-9412-jv-1284-4.html "I agree with the majority that one cannot contract away the right of a child to financial support from one of her parents. One cannot contract away one's liability for negligence either, but we do permit people to buy insurance. If an individual's insurance coverage is inadequate then that person must pay. However, we do not void insurance contracts by invoking a public policy of imposing liability for negligence. The proper procedure to make certain that B.M.T. receives adequate support is that suggested by Judge Chezem's opinion in the Court of Appeals. Straub v. B.M.T. b/n/f Todd (1993), Ind. App., 626 N.E.2d 848, 854. If a person promises to pay the father's share of child support then, if that person is able, he or she should pay."
Created by Futurist110 (talk). Self-nominated at 22:28, 18 February 2021 (UTC).
- I have now reviewed this DYK? nomination here: Template:Did you know nominations/Ken Bridge. Futurist110 (talk) 02:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Date, size, refs, hook, neutrality, QPQ, copyvio spot-check, all GTG. One request for User:Futurist110: can you format the refs with proper citation templates? They are missing date, author, journal, etc. I formatted the book one. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:39, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
