Talk:Storytelling (film)

Red Box

I just wanted to point out that the red box that showed up out of nowhere scared me and probably many other people. I was watching it on IFC one night and the red box came out of nowhere and it scared the crap out of me and some other people probably because like it was freaky I couldn't sleep all night and unless nobody else was startled by it I think we should add something mentioning that it was startling or something, plus according to something the scene blocked out was a rape scene, not sex scene

I've seen the uncensored version (in my country it wasn't censored with the red box) and it's not a rape scene, it's a sex scene. the girl consents, although he makes her say things which are a bit disturbing during. It's not that offensive, and I think the red box made people expect something much worse than what is actually shown! 195.195.71.87 (talk) 13:58, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Xaritix 06:42, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Third segment?

The original version of the film featured a third story, concerning, among other things, a closeted football player played by actor James van der Beek. After being shown in several film festivals, for unknown reasons the entire story was cut from the final version. Many fans aware of this plot point hope for a release of the material, however to date it has not occurred.

Solondz claims the third section was never filmed.

Does anyone have proof of any of this? If the director has stated that the third section was never filmed, then it probably wasn't filmed. The whole "third segment" thing sounds like a rumor to me. (Sugar Bear 03:49, 22 June 2006 (UTC))

I havent heard anything about this. There should be some reference to the 'coloured square' used to censor the notorious sex scene - I think Solondz did this to gain the film an NC-17 rating, although a version without the square is available and is unrated. I'll work this in when I have watched it--ChrisJMoor 14:59, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Here is one source that mentiones the third part and even gives explanations for it beeing cut out http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/article/record_review/15369/Belle_and_Sebastian_Storytelling

topless

I don't think the information that Selma Blair is featured topless is necessary information. It should be removed 84.174.2.49 21:40, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Storytelling.jpg

Image:Storytelling.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:13, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Storytelling.jpg

Image:Storytelling.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:23, 24 January 2008 (UTC)