Talk:Stock-flow consistent model

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 2003:C7:F725:D738:E494:270F:4537:FEF6 in topic Advantages and disadvantages section

Overly technical content

edit

The first version of this article reads like a textbook and seems to assume significant prior knowledge of economics, particularly the "Transaction Flow Matrix" section. It would be useful to further explain why this model is significant in economics and exactly what the matrix fields represent. -Xpctr8 (talk) 14:31, 18 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

I have removed the more technical terms such as transaction flow matrix and has replaced it with rather simple terms. I have also written more explanation as can be seen in my newly submitted article. Could you review it again. Thanks.

Sounds like a brain dump from someone reading Wynne Godley or Gennaro Zezza. It definitely needs improvement. Miguel (talk) 14:51, 11 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Black holes

edit

What do you mean by "the consistent accounting framework prevents the modellers to leave "black holes" i.e., unexplained parts of the model."? --Pierre de Lyon (talk) 11:27, 16 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Advantages and disadvantages section

edit

It seems that all that is listed in this section, at the moment, are advantages. Perhaps people need to write down what the disadvantages are or rename the section. 2003:C7:F725:D738:E494:270F:4537:FEF6 (talk) 17:17, 11 March 2022 (UTC)Reply