Poorly source, non notable controversy

edit

I removed some material that doesn't seem that notable. --Malerooster (talk) 14:44, 14 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Should his political views and accomplishments be noted?

edit

I see the Center for Media and Democracy SOURCEWATCH reports Mr. Rademaker benefited from a controversial deal he negotiated while at the State Department and supported the Iraq weapons of mass destruction theory while at the State Department. Among his many op-eds was one for Federalist Society.

Should his conservative political viewpoint or controversies like these be included? https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Stephen_G._Rademaker https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Stephen_G._Rademaker CommsKathy (talk) 23:12, 13 June 2023 (UTC)Reply