Talk:Steel Meets Steel: Ten Years of Glory

Latest comment: 16 years ago by BetacommandBot in topic Fair use rationale for Image:SteelMeetsSteel.jpg

Untitled edit

What the hell? Something is definitely wrong with this article. One, the chronology part is not hammerFall chronology, it's Helloween's chronology, a whole different heavy metal band. And a HammerFall album should not be mixed with Helloween's chronology. Secondly, it is from this year, not 2002. I seriously believe this article needs to be cleaned up a bit. --194.17.7.150 10:20, 17 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Special Edition edit

File:Hammerfal Steel Meets Steel - Special edition Steel case.jpg
My Copy of HammerFall, Steel Meets Steel

there is a special edition version of this album thats in a steel case that comes with a necklace.

and as far as i know thers a digipack and a jewel case version aswell but nuclear blast have changed the site since i ordered mine, and it wont open in opera, so i cant check Balthazar 17:45, 7 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:SteelMeetsSteel.jpg edit

 

Image:SteelMeetsSteel.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 16:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC)Reply