Talk:St Andrew's Presbyterian Church, Wingham

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

Article is written too personally

edit

I feel this article should be written in a more encyclopaedic way with more detail. Accordingly, it has been tagged for the attention of an expert. KR, --Spaceinput120 (talk) 14:21, 8 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

(Noting the finding of sockpuppetry), I agree with Spaceinput120 (or is it RiverRubicon?). I shall be on the lookout for more sourced information and seek to revise the tone where possible. The 125th Anniversary of the parish is this month so I may be able to contact someone for some more information. Blarneytherinosaur gabby? 08:14, 10 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on St Andrew's Presbyterian Church, Wingham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:44, 21 March 2016 (UTC)Reply