Talk:St. Louis Eagles

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Wizardman in topic GA Review
Good articleSt. Louis Eagles has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 2, 2011Good article nomineeListed

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:St. Louis Eagles/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman Operation Big Bear 19:38, 1 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'll review this article tonight. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 19:38, 1 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Overall this article is good, though I have a few concerns:

  • "Founded as the Ottawa Senators they endured" comma after Senators
  • "Despite winning the Stanley Cup 1927" in 1927
  • "Following the franchises" franchise's
  • "In 1931 an ice hockey rink" comma after 1931
  • "In their first game the Eagles succumbed to a late rally by the defending Stanley Cup champion Black Hawks losing 3–1" comma after hawks
  • "Under Boucher's coaching the team showed improvement" comma after improvement.
  • "the Eagles ownership had lost $70,000 due primarily to the cost of traveiling" comma after 70,000, plus it's traveling
  • Should just be Midwestern instead of Mid-Western
  • "This time the NHL refused.[34] The Eagles were put up for sale." those sentences would work better combined.
  • "and the two players were the only Eagle's players" rm apostrophe

Mainly it was just punctuation issues. I'll put the article on hold and will pass it when the issues are fixed. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 04:36, 2 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thank You for the review! I have made all of the changes noted above. Let me know if there is anything else that needs addressing. Cheers--Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 04:55, 2 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Everything looks good now, so I'll pass the article as a GA. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 05:12, 2 March 2011 (UTC)Reply