Talk:Sri Venkateswara Junior College

Latest comment: 16 years ago by Sting au in topic Reliable sources

Notable alumni

edit

Notable according to WP:BIO? I notice a contributor here keeps adding their name in. Do you think it is a good idea to try and show the world via Wikipedia how notable you think you are when you can't even supply references for this article? I'm thinking the only reason you want the article on the College here is so you can add your name to it. Since Chintapalli David Raju was speedy deleted (twice) doesn't that tell you there is a notability problem? So what about being a Pi memorist, that is just trivial when considering notability for biographical articles here on Wikipedia.--Sting au Buzz Me... 04:29, 1 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

It seems that Chintapalli David Raju has been cornered.Delinking can satisfy or need to produce ducuments to prove his aluminous from this college? Is it courtesy to use the phrase SO WHAT to comment world class pi memorist? --Ganitha (talk) 08:00, 1 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Did I say "world class"? I didn't did I. To show that a person is notable you need to be able to satisfy the criteria listed at WP:BIO. For verifiability see WP:V. I removed the listed persons under the notable alumni section because there are absolutely no refs (see WP:RS) to show and verify how these people are notable.--Sting au Buzz Me... 12:11, 3 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Not "world class".Your phrase"So what about being a Pi memorist" is corect to use here?---Ganitha (talk) 13:24, 3 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

This talk page was deleted with the following comment

edit

To admins like Sting au this page is useless.Since this page was started by me,I respect their feeling by closing this page permanently.Thank you-Chintapalli David Raju(---Mathsdavid (talk) 12:59, 3 April 2008 (UTC)) page restored by User:OrangemikeReply

I'm not an admin Chintapalli. Also you should really not be using all those different accounts to do your edits here. It is called using sock puppets. Please see WP:SOCK.--Sting au Buzz Me... 13:35, 3 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Reliable sources

edit

The Pi website is not a reliable source. It has no references from reliable published sources. This could be anybody's website? You need published news sources to satisfy WP:RS. Please read WP:V.--Sting au Buzz Me... 10:03, 7 April 2008 (UTC)Reply