Questionable medical claims

edit

Much of the peer-reviewed literature about this plant makes various claims about its medicinal properties. I've avoided citing these papers as, despite being published in authentic scientific and medical journals, they really don't sound reliable. This review lists at least ten different categories in which the plant may be medically effective yet little chemical evidence supports any of these claims. Edit with caution. §everal⇒|Times 18:59, 5 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

"Garcinia mangostana and Sphaeranthus indicus" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Garcinia mangostana and Sphaeranthus indicus and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 9#Garcinia mangostana and Sphaeranthus indicus until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Plantdrew (talk) 01:29, 9 April 2022 (UTC)Reply